Fortalezas del Carácter, Triada Oscura de la Personalidad e Inteligencia de Cortejo: un Estudio Predictivo en Adultos Paraguayos un Estudio Predictivo en Adultos Paraguayos
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumen
El cortejo humano ha sido analizado desde diversas ciencias, pero con limitados estudios en América del Sur. Este estudio busca identificar un modelo predictivo de la inteligencia de cortejo, dicha inteligencia es el conjunto de adaptaciones psicológicas humanas desarrolladas para la reproducción sexual. Es una investigación empírica, relacional, cuantitativa, transversal y no experimental. La población estuvo compuesta por un total de 309 adultos paraguayos de ambos sexos y seleccionados mediante muestreo por conveniencia. Se aplicaron los instrumentos: Mating Intelligence Scale, Inventario de Virtudes y Fortalezas del Carácter (IVyF) y Short Dark Triad. Los principales resultados muestran, asociaciones positivas entre inteligencia de cortejo, el narcisismo de la triada oscura de la personalidad y doce fortalezas del carácter de la Clasificación VIA. Además, se identificó que el modelo formado por narcisismo, persistencia, inteligencia social, esperanza y autorregulación predice la inteligencia de cortejo en adultos de Paraguay. Se concluye que existen asociaciones positivas entre inteligencia de cortejo y ciertos rasgos positivos y negativos, además, se identificó un modelo predictivo de la inteligencia de cortejo.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Política propuesta para revistas que ofrecen acceso abierto
Aquellos/as autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los/as autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los/as autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los/as autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Referencias
American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073. http://www.apa.org/ ethics/code2002.html
Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. General Psychology, 8(4), 291-322. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291
Ayala, J. (2021). Fortalezas del carácter en Ecuador, Perú y Paraguay [Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Palermo]. Repositorio de la Universidad de Palermo.
Ayala, J. (2022, diciembre). Psicología evolucionista de las fortalezas del carácter: un área pendiente. Psicología Interamericana Interamerican Psychology, 111, 46-47. https://doi.org/10.30849/psinteram111
Ayala, J. & Croskey, I. (2021). Variables psicológicas asociadas a la inteligencia de cortejo en adultos paraguayos. Summa Psicológica UST, 18(2), 19 – 27.
Ben Hamida, S., Mineka, S., & Bailey, J. M. (1998). Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 953–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.4.953
Blythe, P., Todd, P., & Miller, G. (1999). How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & The ABC Research Group, Evolution and cognition. Simple heuristics that make us smart (p. 257–285). Oxford University Press
Bracanovic, T. (2012). Mating intelligence, moral virtues, and methodological vices. In EPSA philosophy of science (pp. 13-22). Springer.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1-14.
Buss, D. M. (1991). Evolutionary personality psychology. Annual review of psychology, 42(1), 459-491.
Buss, D. (1995). Psicología evolutiva: un nuevo paradigma para la ciencia psicológica. Investigación Psicológica, 6 (1), 1-30.
Buss, D. M. (1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Buss, D. (2019). Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind. Routledge.
Buss, D. M., & Greiling, H. (1999). Adaptive individual differences. Journal of Personality, 67(2), 209-243.
Carmona, J. (2019). Metodología cuantitativa de investigación en intervención psicosocial [Conferencia]. Segundo Taller de “Formación para el desarrollo”, Universidad Iberoamericana UNIBE, Asunción, Paraguay. https://rrii.unibe.edu.py/segundo-taller-de-formacion-para-el-desarrollo/
Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Chapter I-Why Machiavelli. Studies in Machiavellianism, 1-9.
Cosentino, A. C., & Castro Solano, A. (2012). Character strengths: A study of Argentinean soldiers. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n1.37310
Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species by means of natural selection. EA Weeks.
Di Rienzo J.A., Balzarini M.G., González L., Tablada M., Robledo C.W. (2018). InfoStat (Versión 2018). Centro de Transferencia InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. URL http://www.infostat.com.ar
Dunbar, R., Marriott, A. & Duncan, N. (1997). Human conversational behavior. Human Nature, 8, 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912493
Faraway, J. (2016). Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and non parametric regression models. CRC press.
Farthing, G. (2007). Neither daredevils nor wimps: Attitudes toward physical risk takers as mates. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(4), 754-777. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490700500406
Fehr, B., Samsom, D., Paulhus, D. L. (1992). The construct ofMachiavellianism: Twenty years later. In: Spielberger, C. D., Butcher, J. N. (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment (pp.77-116). Erlbaum.
Feist, J., Feist, G., & Roberts, T. (2017). Theories of personality. McGraw-Hill.
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Factor (Version 10.5.03). Tarragona: Universitat Roviri i Virgili. http://psico.fcep.urv.es/utilitats/factor/
Ferragut, M., Blanca, M. J., & Ortiz-Tallo, M. (2014a). Analysis of adolescent profiles by gender: Strengths, attitudes toward violence and sexism. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, Artículo e59. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.60
Gangestad, S. y Buss, D. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(2), 89-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(4), 573-587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X
Geher, G. & Kaufman, S. B. (2007). The quiz: Mating IQ. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/articles/200701/the-quiz-mating-iq
Geher, G., & Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Mating intelligence unleashed: The role of the mind in sex, dating, and love. Oxford University Press.
Geher, G., Kaufman, S. B., Garcia, J., Kaufman, J., & Dawson, B. (2016). The validity and structure of mating intelligence. Evolution, Mind and Behaviour, 14(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1556/2050.2016.0001
Gómez-Gómez, M., Danglot-Banck, C., & Vega-Franco, L. (2003). Sinopsis de pruebas estadísticas no paramétricas. Cuándo usarlas. Revista Mexicana de Pediatría, 70(2), 91–99.
Haavio-Mannila, E. & Kontula, O. (1997). Correlates of increased sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26(4), 399-419. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024591318836
Hare, R. D. (1985). Comparison of procedures for the assessment of psychopathy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 7.
Haselton, M., & Buss, D. (2000). Error management theory: A new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.81
Haselton, M. & Miller, G. (2006). Women's fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Human Nature, 17(1), 50-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1020-0
Jacobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The dark triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339.
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment, 22(2), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019265
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2009). Machiavellianism.
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3) a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28-41.
Kanazawa, S. (2000). Scientific discoveries as cultural displays: A further test of Miller's courtship model. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(5), 317-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00051-9
Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R. I. (2001). Who dares, wins : Heroism versus altruism in women's mate choice. Human Nature, 12(2), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-001-1018-6
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Ellis, B. J. (2007). An evolutionary-psychological approach to self-esteem: Multiple domains and multiple functions. In Fletcher, G. & Clark, M. (Eds), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 409-436). Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Korkmaz S, Goksuluk D, Zararsiz G. (2014). MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality. The R Journal, 6(2):151-163.
Linley, A. P., Maltby, J., Wood, A. M., Joseph, S., Harrington, S., Peterson, C., Park, N, & Seligman, M. E. (2007). Character strengths in the United Kingdom: The VIA Inventory of Strengths. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(2), 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.1
MacDonald, K. (1995). Evolution, the five‐factor model, and levels of personality. Journal of personality, 63(3), 525-567.
Mann, N. B. (2012). Signature strengths: Gender differences in creativity, persistence, prudence, gratitude, and hope. Northcentral University.
Marlowe, F. (2003). The mating system of foragers in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross-Cultural Research, 37(3), 282-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103254008
Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human. nature. Doubleday.
Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic fitness: How sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 2(1), 20-25.
Miller, G. (2008). Mating intelligence: Frequently asked questions. En Geher, G. y Miller, G. (Eds.), Mating intelligence: Sex, relationships, and the mind's reproductive system (p. 367–393). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (1993). Narcissism and self-evaluation maintenance: Explorations in object relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 668-676.
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Expanding the dynamic self-regulatory processing model of narcissism: Research directions for the future. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 243-251.
Mullins-Nelson, J. L., Salekin, R. T., & Leistico, A. M. R. (2006). Psychopathy, empathy, and perspective-taking ability in a community sample: Implications for the successful psychopathy concept. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5(2), 133-149.
Neto, J., Neto, F., & Furnham, A. (2014). Gender and psychological correlates of self-rated strengths among youth. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0417-5
Nettle, D., Clegg, H., & Miell, D. (2006). Status and mating success amongst visual artists. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00310
Newlin, D. (2002). The self‐perceived survival ability and reproductive fitness (SPFit) theory of substance use disorders. Addiction, 97(4), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00021.x
Nichols, C. P., Sheldon, K. M., & Sheldon, M. S. (2008). Evolution and personality: What should a comprehensive theory address and how?. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(2), 968-984.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556- 563.
Peterson, A., Geher, G. & Kaufman, S. (2011). Predicting preferences for sex acts: Which traits matter most, and why?. Ep Journal, 9(03), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491100900308
Porto Noronha, A. P. P., & Martins, D. D. F. (2016). Associations between character strengths and life satisfaction: A study with college students. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 19(2), 90–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.14718/ACP.2016.19.2.5
Puts, D. & Dawood, K. (2006). The evolution of female orgasm: Adaptation or byproduct?. Twin Research and Human Genetics: The Official Journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 9(3), 467-72. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.9.3.467
Raskin, R. N., & Hall, C. S. (1979). A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports.
Raskin, R., & Terry, H. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 890.
Rauthmann, J. F. (2012). Towards multifaceted machiavellianism: Content, factorial, and construct validity of a German Machiavellianism Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 345-351.
Rauthmann, J. F., & Will, T. (2011). Proposing a multidimensional machiavellianism conceptualization. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 39(3), 391-403
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Versión 3.4.2) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
RStudio Team. (2016). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. https://rstudio.com/
Rosseel, Y. (2017). lavaan, version 0.5-23.1097: Latent variable analysis. https://lavaan.ugent.be/
Salessi, S., & Omar, A. (2018). Psychometric properties of a scale to measure the dark side of personality. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 35, 159-170.
Schmitt, D. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2), 247-311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000051
Shaner, A., Miller, G. & Mintz, J. (2004). Schizophrenia as one extreme of a sexually selected fitness indicator. Elsevier, 70(1), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.014
Sluming, V. A., & Manning, J. T. (2000). Second to fourth digit ratio in elite musicians: Evidence for musical ability as an honest signal of male fitness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00026-4
Sozou, P. & M Seymour, R. (2005). Costly but worthless gifts facilitate courtship. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272(1575), 1877-84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3152
Tripathi, R., Banu, H., & Mehrotra, S. (2015). Self-perceived character strengths in urban Indian youth: Observations and reflections. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 41(3), 175–186. https://tinyurl.com/yb56avwy
Tybur, J., Miller, G. & Gangestad, S. (2007).Testing the controversy: An empirical examination of adaptationists' attitudes toward politics and science. Human Nature, 18(4), 313-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-007-9024-y
Weisfeld, G. (2006). Humor appreciation as an adaptive esthetic emotion. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 19(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMOR.2006.001
Williams, K. M., Nathanson, C., & Paulhus, D. L. (2003, August). Structure and validity of the self-report psychopathy scale-III in normal populations. In 111th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (pp. 1-12).
Wilson, D. S., Near, D., & Miller, R. R. (1996). Machiavellianism: a synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 285.