Partner phubbing scale: Evidências de validade e precisão
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resumen
El presente trabajo fue organizado en dos estudios y tuvo por objetivo adaptar y validar a Partner Phubbing Scale para la realidad brasileña. El Estudio 1 tuvo la participación de 233 personas mientras que el Estudio 2 contó con 217 personas, todas en alguna relación amorosa. En ambos estudios respondieron a Partner Phubbing Scale ya cuestiones sociodemográficas. Los resultados del Estudio 1 fueron a nivel exploratorio apuntando la unidimensionalidad del instrumento con consistencia interna de 0,96; en el Estudio 2 el análisis factorial confirmatorio apuntó para un buen ajuste del modelo unidimensional (CFI = 0,99, TLI = 0,99, y RMSEA (IC 90%) = 0,03) con confiabilidad de 0,88. Los datos sugieren que el Partner Phubbing Scale es adecuado para su uso en investigaciones futuras sobre el partner phubbing, visto su adecuación a los parámetros psicométricos investigados en dos momentos diferentes.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Número
Sección
Artículos originales
Derechos de autor 2020 Summa Psicológica
Política propuesta para revistas que ofrecen acceso abierto
Aquellos/as autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los/as autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cual estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los/as autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los/as autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Referencias
Abeele, M. M. V., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562-569. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005
Água, J., Coelho, C., Lourenço, M. G., Patrão, I., & Leal, I. Partner Phubbing (Pphubbing): Validação Portuguesa. In Actas do 8º Congresso Internacional de Psicologia da Criança e Adolescente (pp. 200-201). Retrieved from: http://actas.lis.ulusiada.pt/index.php/cipca/article/view/684
Baglin, J. (2014). Improving Your Exploratory Factor Analysis for Ordinal Data: A Demonstration Using FACTOR. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(5). Retrieved from: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=19&n=5
Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of marriage and family, 62(4), 964-980. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x
Cha, E. S., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques. Journal of advanced nursing, 58(4), 386-395. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
Cizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, Though Satisfied: Pphubbing Behavior And Relationship Satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 7(2), 364-375. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.7456/10702100/018
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59, 19-36. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.541336
González-Rivera, J., Segura-Abreu, L., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing en las Relaciones Románticas: Uso del Celular, Satisfacción en la Pareja, Bienestar Psicológico y Salud Mental. Interacciones, 4(2), 81-91. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.24016/2018.v4n2.117
Haigh, A. (2015). Stop phubbing. Retrieved from: http://stopphubbing.com
Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6ª ed.). Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.
Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386-394. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051
Holgado-Tello, F., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality and Quantity, 44, 153-166. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y
Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the internet, and social media. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from: https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). The effects of cell phone usage rules on satisfaction in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 17-34. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.642263
Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG 3 Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Mooresville: Scientific Software.
Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: the quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105–114. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2
Pasquali, L. (1999). Instrumentos psicológicos: Manual prático de elaboração. Brasília: Lab- PAM-ibapp.
Pasquali, L. (2003). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Pasquali, L. (2009). Psychometrics. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 43(SPE), 992-999. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342009000500002
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 237-246. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827
R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna, Austria.
Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center, 26. Retrieved from: https://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/
Roberts, J. & David, M. (2016). My life becomes a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Shapiro, A., & Ten Berge, J. M. (2002). Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis. Psychometrika, 67, 79-94. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294710
Siegel, D. J. (2010). The mindful therapist: A clinician's guide to mindsight and neural integration. New York, NY: Norton.
Walsh, S. P., White, K. M., & Young, R. M. (2010). Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 194–203. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530903567229
Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12-17. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.014
Água, J., Coelho, C., Lourenço, M. G., Patrão, I., & Leal, I. Partner Phubbing (Pphubbing): Validação Portuguesa. In Actas do 8º Congresso Internacional de Psicologia da Criança e Adolescente (pp. 200-201). Retrieved from: http://actas.lis.ulusiada.pt/index.php/cipca/article/view/684
Baglin, J. (2014). Improving Your Exploratory Factor Analysis for Ordinal Data: A Demonstration Using FACTOR. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(5). Retrieved from: http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=19&n=5
Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of marriage and family, 62(4), 964-980. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x
Cha, E. S., Kim, K. H., & Erlen, J. A. (2007). Translation of scales in cross‐cultural research: issues and techniques. Journal of advanced nursing, 58(4), 386-395. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04242.x
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.018
Cizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, Though Satisfied: Pphubbing Behavior And Relationship Satisfaction. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 7(2), 364-375. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.7456/10702100/018
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
Duran, R. L., Kelly, L., & Rotaru, T. (2011). Mobile phones in romantic relationships and the dialectic of autonomy versus connection. Communication Quarterly, 59, 19-36. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.541336
González-Rivera, J., Segura-Abreu, L., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing en las Relaciones Románticas: Uso del Celular, Satisfacción en la Pareja, Bienestar Psicológico y Salud Mental. Interacciones, 4(2), 81-91. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.24016/2018.v4n2.117
Haigh, A. (2015). Stop phubbing. Retrieved from: http://stopphubbing.com
Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados (6ª ed.). Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.
Halpern, D., & Katz, J. E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386-394. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051
Holgado-Tello, F., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality and Quantity, 44, 153-166. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y
Lenhart, A., & Duggan, M. (2014). Couples, the internet, and social media. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from: https://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000065
Miller-Ott, A. E., Kelly, L., & Duran, R. L. (2012). The effects of cell phone usage rules on satisfaction in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 17-34. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2012.642263
Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG 3 Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Mooresville: Scientific Software.
Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: the quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514539755
Oulasvirta, A., Rattenbury, T., Ma, L., & Raita, E. (2012). Habits make smartphone use more pervasive. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(1), 105–114. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0412-2
Pasquali, L. (1999). Instrumentos psicológicos: Manual prático de elaboração. Brasília: Lab- PAM-ibapp.
Pasquali, L. (2003). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.
Pasquali, L. (2009). Psychometrics. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 43(SPE), 992-999. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342009000500002
Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 237-246. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512453827
R Core Team (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna, Austria.
Rainie, L., & Zickuhr, K. (2015). Americans’ views on mobile etiquette. Pew Research Center, 26. Retrieved from: https://www.pewinternet.org/2015/08/26/americans-views-on-mobile-etiquette/
Roberts, J. & David, M. (2016). My life becomes a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058
Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Shapiro, A., & Ten Berge, J. M. (2002). Statistical inference of minimum rank factor analysis. Psychometrika, 67, 79-94. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294710
Siegel, D. J. (2010). The mindful therapist: A clinician's guide to mindsight and neural integration. New York, NY: Norton.
Walsh, S. P., White, K. M., & Young, R. M. (2010). Needing to connect: The effect of self and others on young people’s involvement with their mobile phones. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 194–203. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530903567229
Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12-17. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.014